A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving future neighbours around the construction of the wall at a coastal site inside a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide consideration following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household home at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of preparing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has developed right into a highly publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building works at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, look for to build their family members home. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of recognized residents. According to the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each residents of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing permission by creating a wall over and above the boundaries of their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Exclusive Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are subject to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, significantly in the sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly developed, is in the proper place. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their view, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are both of those hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-significant drinking water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods, a picture which has since become emblematic with the depth with the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble visual proof from the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Occasions noted, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water through significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the internet site turned One of the more striking descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely famous that these kinds of actions were cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were covered intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned broadly searched phrases as audience sought to know the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute inside the legal timeline.
On the Main of your dispute is a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as made, goes past what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has actually been described as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling documents, maps, and disorders attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is inspired by worry for environmental safety and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as a substitute that it's about making sure that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have explained their extensive-standing connection to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair simply looking to create a spouse and children house in accordance With all the law. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Spot of Conservation and say that every one is effective have already been performed depending on Qualified suggestions and authorised strategies. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea during a storm, will not change the underlying facts.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around development of wall at coastal web-site has René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site grown to be a shorthand description for a problem that numerous observers see as ever more frequent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from quite different professional backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waist-substantial drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting both of those the Bodily reality in the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an abnormal solution.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the result remains uncertain. The court will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Exclusive Spot of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Still the human element stays central: neighbours who must Are living alongside one another long once the lawful costs are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the situation prolong outside of that address. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary difficulties for instance environmental protection and property legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of pure natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of your dispute stands partially crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Whether or not it will eventually in the end be altered, taken off, or finished as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely continue on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most intently watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin lately.